Pressemblée
Sandrine Rousseau
Highly visible
Sandrine Rousseau is highly visible, written about in a cold, clearly negative tone (treated more harshly than 78% of covered members), and more often the target of the story than the typical member, cast in conflict stories more than most.
Recent shift:vs 7d■ +0.00vs 30d▼ -0.14
Framing fingerprint
What kind of story they're cast in
~ exploratory frame, measured less reliably, so read it with caution (see Methodology).
Bar = this member · tick = the average across all members.
Dominant frame
Headline's main angle
Conflict66%
Responsibility12%
Human interest9%
No single frame9%
Morality3%
Economic0%
Where they sit
Rousseau vs the whole Assembly
How the press casts them
Tone, broken down by their role in the headline
Targeted8%-0.29
Mentioned67%-0.30
Speaking25%-0.14
Directed tone is how a headline casts Sandrine Rousseau, not the day's overall mood. Being the target of a story reads far more negative than being quoted acting in one, so the single score above blends two different things.
Over time
Monthly net tone
Who covers them, and how
Outlet breakdown, left → right
L'Humanité-2.41-0.11n=9
Mediapart-1.63+0.33n=3
Libération-1.08-0.05n=20
Le HuffPost-1-0.29n=24
Le Nouvel Obs-0.89+0.00n=11
Le Monde-0.71+0.00n=4
Marianne-0.65-0.64n=11
Franceinfo-0.41-0.02n=45
20 Minutes-0.31-0.25n=20
BFMTV+0.07-0.09n=32
Le Parisien+0.1-0.35n=23
TF1 INFO+0.36-0.25n=4
Le Point+0.56-0.32n=19
JDD+0.95-0.53n=53
CNEWS+0.96-0.46n=24
Le Figaro+1.02-0.20n=54
Atlantico+1.08-0.25n=4
Valeurs actuelles+1.87-0.33n=42