Pressemblée
Paul Vannier
Occasionally covered
Paul Vannier is occasionally covered, written about in a cool, leans negative tone (treated about like the typical member), and more often the one speaking or acting than the typical member, cast in conflict stories more than most.
Recent shift:vs 7d— vs 30d▲ +2.00
Framing fingerprint
What kind of story they're cast in
~ exploratory frame, measured less reliably, so read it with caution (see Methodology).
Bar = this member · tick = the average across all members.
Dominant frame
Headline's main angle
Conflict59%
Responsibility20%
No single frame14%
Human interest7%
Where they sit
Vannier vs the whole Assembly
How the press casts them
Tone, broken down by their role in the headline
Targeted2%-1.00
Mentioned68%-0.03
Speaking30%-0.15
Directed tone is how a headline casts Paul Vannier, not the day's overall mood. Being the target of a story reads far more negative than being quoted acting in one, so the single score above blends two different things.
Over time
Monthly net tone
Who covers them, and how
Outlet breakdown, left → right
L'Humanité-2.41+0.25n=4
Libération-1.08+0.00n=4
Le Monde-0.71+0.00n=3
Franceinfo-0.41+0.14n=7
Le Parisien+0.1+0.00n=3
Le Figaro+1.02-0.50n=4